Most debate ranking systems are broken in one of two ways: they reward volume over quality (show up to everything, rack up points regardless of performance), or they reward cherry-picking (win two prestigious tournaments, skip everything else, sit at #1 all season).
The DPI was built from scratch to solve both problems. It evaluates debaters across multiple dimensions and uses a weighted formula that forces a simple truth: the path to the top requires showing up consistently, to strong tournaments, and performing well at each one.
A debater must demonstrate excellence across a sufficient body of work. Two good tournaments is not a season.
Attending 20 tournaments and going 3-3 at each is not a path to the top of the rankings.
The system rewards debaters who choose their schedule thoughtfully, prepare deeply, and perform consistently.
Six dimensions, weighted and balanced to reward genuine competitive excellence.
How far you advance matters. Winning a tournament earns significantly more than a quarterfinal exit, which earns more than missing the break. Your preliminary record is also factored — going undefeated in prelims carries a meaningful bonus.
Raw speaker points vary wildly between tournaments — a 29 at one event might be average, while a 28 at another could be exceptional. The DPI normalizes speaker points across all tournaments so your performance is measured relative to the field you competed against, not an arbitrary scale.
Beating a top-ranked debater is worth more than beating an unranked novice. Every win is evaluated based on your opponent's current DPI standing. This means debaters who compete at strong tournaments with deep fields are rewarded for facing tougher competition.
Not all tournaments are created equal. A championship-level national invitational carries more weight than a local scrimmage. Tournaments are classified into four tiers based on objective criteria like field size, geographic draw, and competitor strength.
The DPI rewards debaters who perform at a reliably high level across their season. If your top results cluster tightly — showing you bring it every weekend — you earn a consistency bonus. Wild swings between dominant performances and early exits are penalized.
You need a body of work to earn a ranking. The DPI requires a minimum number of tournaments to qualify, and debaters with too few results are penalized. But volume alone doesn't help — attending 20 mediocre tournaments won't outscore 8 excellent ones.
Each tournament you attend generates a Tournament Point Total (TPT) based on your results, speaker points, opponent strength, and tournament prestige.
Your results enter a rolling 52-week window. More recent results carry more weight. You need at least 5 tournaments to qualify for official rankings.
The system selects your best 7 tournament performances. Additional results beyond 7 contribute diminishing bonus points — but bad results are discarded.
Your score is adjusted for consistency (reliable performers earn a bonus) and competitive volume (too few tournaments = penalty). The final number is your DPI.
Tournaments are classified by objective criteria — field size, geographic draw, competitor strength, and elimination depth.
National championships, premier invitationals with 80+ entries drawing from 5+ states, elite field strength, and deep elimination brackets.
Large, nationally-attended invitationals with 40–79 entries, multi-regional draw, and strong competitive fields.
Regional invitationals and standard circuit events with 16–39 entries. The backbone of most debaters' seasons.
Smaller local events with 8–15 entries. Great for building experience, but carry less weight in the rankings.
Create your free account and start tracking your DPI today.